To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
"You can't do NOTHING with QNX..."
Ignoring the double negative...
I'd better call my customers quickly, then, since we've got about 100 industrial robots (we're a small company) doing "nothing" because they're running on QNX. Oh, and somebody put in a call to NASA and tell them the International Space Station isn't working either. Neither, apparently, is the Cabury plant in Canada, which is clearly NOT producing 48 million pounds of chocolate bars a year using QNX. And I guess we'll have to tell Audi, Accura, & Saab that their high-end, luxury in-car entertainment systems don't work. Or if you want to be REALLY scared, how about the anasthesia machines running on QNX? I guess they "can't do nothing" either. </sarcasm>
I would much rather be hooked up to an anasthesia machine running QNX than Linux. Sure, QNX doesn't have the best photo editors, chat clients, or games. But when you're talking about millions of dollars or even human life on the line, is "can I get on AIM?" really a relevant question?
"I would much rather be hooked up to an anasthesia machine running QNX than Linux. Sure, QNX doesn't have the best photo editors, chat clients, or games. But when you're talking about millions of dollars or even human life on the line, is "can I get on AIM?" really a relevant question?"
The "but it sucks on the desktop" crowd really annoys me, as if there's no life beyond the desktop.
But you just did the exact opposite here. Linux may be suited for the desktop (which I think it isn't yet, but that's a different story), but that doesn't mean it isn't suited for critical embedded applications too (there are medical systems out controlled by software running on Windows XP, which I find much more disturbing).
I believe we're all speaking about the desktop version, right ? Osnews deals with Linux, Morphos, skyos, reactos, etc... Are these embedded OSes ? Noooo, and thus I'm NOT speaking about the embedded version of QNX which is famously known for its power. So please don't put silly words in my mouth... This article competition mostly deals with DESKTOP OS, not embedded !
Currently, from a desktop point of view, QNX lacks of many many many features to compete with other opponent operating system. One thing that was (isn't anymore as QNX NC was pulled) hyped and promoted about QNX is how it is POSIX compliant, and how easy it is to convert softwares from *nix and Linux. Thus all of this for a promised usage as desktop OS.
The article deals with the desktop edition of QNX (shelf, photon gui, ...), and concludes that QNX is fast, reliable, etc... Sure, but unusable for the common buddy
And the competition is about desktop OS to be discovered by the common guys outa there !
Kochise





Member since:
2006-03-03
You can't do NOTHING with QNX, especially with the 6.3, and even less (than NOTHING) after the 30 days ran out...
Kochise