Linked by James Ingraham on Mon 24th Jul 2006 11:15 UTC
QNX In today's entry in our Alternative OS Contest, James Ingraham takes a close look at QNX, the operating system based on the Neutrino microkernel. He concludes that "While you can probably find solutions for just about all of your desktop computing needs using the QNX RTOS, that is not QNX's strong suit. Its focus is real-time, embedded, and mission critical applications." Read on for the whole article.
Thread beginning with comment 146014
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: For all you QNX bashers...
by Kochise on Tue 25th Jul 2006 03:16 UTC in reply to "RE: For all you QNX bashers..."
Kochise
Member since:
2006-03-03

You can't do NOTHING with QNX, especially with the 6.3, and even less (than NOTHING) after the 30 days ran out...

Kochise

Reply Parent Score: 2

chrish Member since:
2005-07-14

Let us know how you fare using VxWorks or another embedded OS as a desktop system, I'm sure that would make a very interesting article that OS News would be happy to publish for you.

- chrish @ QNX

Reply Parent Score: 2

ingraham Member since:
2006-05-20

"You can't do NOTHING with QNX..."

Ignoring the double negative...

I'd better call my customers quickly, then, since we've got about 100 industrial robots (we're a small company) doing "nothing" because they're running on QNX. Oh, and somebody put in a call to NASA and tell them the International Space Station isn't working either. Neither, apparently, is the Cabury plant in Canada, which is clearly NOT producing 48 million pounds of chocolate bars a year using QNX. And I guess we'll have to tell Audi, Accura, & Saab that their high-end, luxury in-car entertainment systems don't work. Or if you want to be REALLY scared, how about the anasthesia machines running on QNX? I guess they "can't do nothing" either. </sarcasm>

I would much rather be hooked up to an anasthesia machine running QNX than Linux. Sure, QNX doesn't have the best photo editors, chat clients, or games. But when you're talking about millions of dollars or even human life on the line, is "can I get on AIM?" really a relevant question?

Reply Parent Score: 1

CrLf Member since:
2006-01-03

"I would much rather be hooked up to an anasthesia machine running QNX than Linux. Sure, QNX doesn't have the best photo editors, chat clients, or games. But when you're talking about millions of dollars or even human life on the line, is "can I get on AIM?" really a relevant question?"

The "but it sucks on the desktop" crowd really annoys me, as if there's no life beyond the desktop.

But you just did the exact opposite here. Linux may be suited for the desktop (which I think it isn't yet, but that's a different story), but that doesn't mean it isn't suited for critical embedded applications too (there are medical systems out controlled by software running on Windows XP, which I find much more disturbing).

Reply Parent Score: 1

Kochise Member since:
2006-03-03

I believe we're all speaking about the desktop version, right ? Osnews deals with Linux, Morphos, skyos, reactos, etc... Are these embedded OSes ? Noooo, and thus I'm NOT speaking about the embedded version of QNX which is famously known for its power. So please don't put silly words in my mouth... This article competition mostly deals with DESKTOP OS, not embedded !

Currently, from a desktop point of view, QNX lacks of many many many features to compete with other opponent operating system. One thing that was (isn't anymore as QNX NC was pulled) hyped and promoted about QNX is how it is POSIX compliant, and how easy it is to convert softwares from *nix and Linux. Thus all of this for a promised usage as desktop OS.

The article deals with the desktop edition of QNX (shelf, photon gui, ...), and concludes that QNX is fast, reliable, etc... Sure, but unusable for the common buddy ;) And the competition is about desktop OS to be discovered by the common guys outa there !

Kochise

Reply Parent Score: 1