Linked by Eugenia Loli on Fri 28th Jul 2006 18:28 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 147142
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-11-13
That last statement, "if you're running Windows, its pretty obvious that you're a 100% Microsoft house with little likelihood of running software from other vendors"
My company has developers who code mostly on Windows, but a few are on Linux too. The backend is a mix of mostly Java web stuff running on Apache and Resin on a mix of both Linux and Windows. There is a bit of .NET code thrown in for good measure.
As an end user, when it comes down to a choice between Java and .NET, it reminds me of that old question, "Would you rather be eaten out by Jaws or fingered by Captain Hook?" Can I choose neither, please? Can't the IT industry put their heads together and figure out a way to code native, cross-platform apps easily so we can drop this virtual machine crap?