Linked by Eugenia Loli on Fri 28th Jul 2006 18:28 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 147153
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Java is anything but simple,
by Lambda on Fri 28th Jul 2006 20:19
in reply to "RE[3]: Java is anything but simple, "
RE[5]: Java is anything but simple,
by buff on Sat 29th Jul 2006 12:31
in reply to "RE[3]: Java is anything but simple, "
I find Java useful on the desktop and wouldn't call it useless. I use limewire daily and it runs on Java. I download all my bittorents using the excellent azureus UI. I like the new direction of Java UI's where they are using the native toolkits instead of Swing. Azureus and Eclipe are good examples of this UI approach.




Member since:
2006-04-28
I thought that when they talked about Java for the web they were referring more to JSP pages rather than Java applets.
Personally I prefer PHP webs than JSP webs. They are faster and seem much more flexible. But some say (and it's probably true) that PHP is not secure enough for some kind of webs (for example, for banks) so those use JSP more (or ASP from .NET). In fact the only reason I have Java on my desktop is because I need it to enter my bank's web page. Otherwise I find it useless for a desktop.