Linked by Eugenia Loli on Sun 30th Jul 2006 20:57 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 147697
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: worst. informit link. ever.
by Eugenia on Sun 30th Jul 2006 22:33
in reply to "worst. informit link. ever."
RE[2]: worst. informit link. ever.
by Cloudy on Sun 30th Jul 2006 23:19
in reply to "RE: worst. informit link. ever."
No. They have enough misinformation to have you confuse pattern replacement patterns with regular expersions.
I've seen discussions of regular expressions in fewer words that did a better job and didn't cause people to confuse them with the '*' and '?' glob patterns.
Nor do these discussions give you enough to get started, as they don't even cover all of the syntax in the example they gave.
Writing an example that you don't even explain is lousy exposition. period.
http://www.regular-expressions.info/tutorial.html which is the first hit in google for regular expression tutorial is far better and doesn't try to confuse people by comparing regexps to something they're not.





Member since:
2006-02-15
Congratulations. You have linked to an article that claims to be about regular expressions which has NO discussion of regular expressions in it.
Then you followed it up with an article that supposedly explains regular expressions but only muddies the water by confusing the uninitiated about the difference between naive pattern matching and regular expressions.
Please stop. Informit articles suck.