Linked by Eugenia Loli on Sun 6th Aug 2006 17:30 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 149630
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Misses an importanting point
by anonymousbrowser on Sun 6th Aug 2006 21:48
in reply to "RE[2]: Misses an importanting point"
RE[4]: Misses an importanting point
by fffffh on Sun 6th Aug 2006 23:42
in reply to "RE[3]: Misses an importanting point"
RE[4]: Misses an importanting point
by Sodki on Mon 7th Aug 2006 10:20
in reply to "RE[3]: Misses an importanting point"
No, it isn't, even if the wrapper were LGPL'd it would, IIRC, be swallowed up and turned GPL when linked into the kernel at runtime, your GPL wrapper can't link to a non-GPL compatible module.
The nVidia wrapper is under GPL. The wrapper doesn't link to the binary driver, it loads it dinamically, so it's OK.





Member since:
2005-11-10
And, if proprietary driver is wrapped into an open source(GPL) code that access the other parts of the kernel ?
That's how the nVidia proprietary drivers works and it's totally legit.