To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Would your prefer the Microsoft approach of promising the world and then not being able to deliver?
To a degree, yes. Even though Microsoft may not deliver all the products, if they announce these products and what they can do they get the ideas out there then others can take the same idea and run with it and make a working copy. Now we can have a promised feature from a third party even if Microsoft couldn't deliver on it. This is all in theory of course, but is plausible.
Even though Microsoft may not deliver all the products, if they announce these products and what they can do they get the ideas out there then others can take the same idea and run with it and make a working copy. Now we can have a promised feature from a third party even if Microsoft couldn't deliver on it. This is all in theory of course, but is plausible.
This would be nice if Microsoft earned their money by delivering ideas, but they are supposed to deliver an operating system. Their ideas are usually not even new (Faster Search? 3D-Desktop?). Being sure about what will be in a new version of the OS and what's not is valuable, for business and developers.





Member since:
2006-08-02
Would your prefer the Microsoft approach of promising the world and then not being able to deliver? Apple typically takes the more cautious approach so they can over-deliver in the end.