To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
LOL, you misunderstood me (or perhaps I expressed myself incorrectly).
I meant Apache Group won't accept patches from OBSD group. And OBSD group won't accept unpatched versions from Apache; then there's the Licence issue which is for real... the new Apache 2.0 Licence is a "mess of a licence" (sic)
But there are other projects that could be used as an example, most "semi-important" pieces of software in OpenBSD (Apache, Bind, Samba, Sendmail, etc.) have OpenBSD Patches; some of these patches make it to the originals, some are not accepted... unfortunely.
Then we have the Licences issues, if it's not really free, it won't make it.
Then you have "old and huge" problems like the QMail story... but that's another (long) story. 




Member since:
2006-03-12
No, Apache not being updated is because of the disgusting mess of a licence that Apache now uses. The security patches being ignored was why the developers dislike the Apache project, not the reason they will never use any of their newer code.