Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 15th Aug 2006 18:11 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 152744
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Interesting, but...
by orestes on Wed 16th Aug 2006 03:45
in reply to "RE: Interesting, but..."
RE[3]: Interesting, but...
by drdoug on Wed 16th Aug 2006 06:38
in reply to "RE[2]: Interesting, but..."
I would not define what they need to do is playing around. Java is not a "Hello World" sized app, therefore it takes time to make sure that any license changes they are doing is legal. Personally, I don't care what license they use, though it would be a nice sideshow if it is not GPL 




Member since:
2006-04-30
The license will be one that THEY can rightfully use. You maybe unware that not all of Java is written by Sun. So the license that choose will also depend on how much other people would like to release.
Sun would like to use GPL (I assume you are a GPL fanboy) as they have done in many other projects, but GPL is a problem if not all code is releasable.