Linked by Eugenia Loli on Tue 15th Aug 2006 23:21 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 152980
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: No different than MP3 vs OGG
by hal2k1 on Thu 17th Aug 2006 00:42
in reply to "RE[3]: No different than MP3 vs OGG"
//Vorbis takes more processor power to play than an equivalent mp3. Unless a more powerful and more expensive chip is used, portable players simply don't have the ability to play ogg.//
So far this is just an unsupported allegation. Evidence please.
There are a multitude of players that do include the ability to play ogg vorbis files.
I have yet to see any evidence at all to indicate that these players necessarily consume more power than others that don not support ogg vorbis files.




Member since:
2005-07-07
Agreed, surely it won't cost the manufacturers (of mp3 players) anything to include these 2 codecs with their offerings?
Not quite true. Vorbis takes more processor power to play than an equivalent mp3. Unless a more powerful and more expensive chip is used, portable players simply don't have the ability to play ogg.