Linked by Eugenia Loli-Queru on Wed 16th Aug 2006 23:00 UTC
Mac OS X For Mac geeks of a certain persuasion, the first mention of a soon-to-be-revealed feature of Leopard during the WWDC keynote set off a mental chain-reaction. That feature was Time Machine, and the name alone was enough to cause one particular phrase to hammer in the mind of many people, including me: "New file system in Leopard!" It was even a bingo square. In fact, it was my personal favorite bingo square, and the one that I most looked forward to marking.
Thread beginning with comment 153143
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: disappointed with HFS+
by CPUGuy on Thu 17th Aug 2006 12:50 UTC in reply to "RE: disappointed with HFS+"
CPUGuy
Member since:
2005-07-06

NTFS is perfectly capable filesystem, was actually advanced for it's time, and has been updated regularly with each Windows release (NT4, 2000, XP, and even in Vista).

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE[3]: disappointed with HFS+
by Tuishimi on Thu 17th Aug 2006 19:34 in reply to "RE[2]: disappointed with HFS+"
Tuishimi Member since:
2005-07-06

If anything it is underused by Windows.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE[4]: disappointed with HFS+
by CPUGuy on Fri 18th Aug 2006 04:33 in reply to "RE[3]: disappointed with HFS+"
CPUGuy Member since:
2005-07-06

Extremely.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1