Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 21st Aug 2006 19:09 UTC, submitted by Martin Wolper
Thread beginning with comment 154633
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: I was disappointed...
by nick on Tue 22nd Aug 2006 05:44
in reply to "RE[5]: I was disappointed..."
Then once you're on samba, why would you use reactos
over linux for enterprise file serving?
Definitely not because it is faster or more scalable,
more stable, better tested, or better supported?
The only thing I can think of is where the win32 API is
required. If that is a critical requirement, then in
server space, any enterprise would be highly likely to
keep their existing NT installation, no?






Member since:
2006-01-27
Granted at this time it is not suitable to replace anything including a server. However, once we get closer to 1.0 we will be able to run all samba tools. We already can run file and printing client samba tools and will soon (starting in 0.3.1) be including samba-tng command line tools in all our releases.