Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 22nd Aug 2006 17:04 UTC, submitted by lh8
Thread beginning with comment 154918
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.




Member since:
2005-08-02
First difference is devotion: the Puppy developer is hand-tuning every application of the distro (this includes bug-reporting, bug-fixing and choosing unconventional versions of software).
He doesn't just package the software like so many others, he only delivers working and tested sofware. And he keeps the track of it.
Sure, there are many other distros with helpful config GUIs, but the Puppy-tools and dialog-windows are unique, not copies or variations. But they are also ununiform and doing without the "beauty" of gtk- or qt-tools
And Puppy is one of the few LiveCDs, that comes with fully working multimedia "out-of-the-box" (PCLinuxOS is the other one)