Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 23rd Aug 2006 13:18 UTC, submitted by nicoladagostino
From the AppleInsider forum comes an interesting discovery about ZFS and Apple. A user who has the Leopard WWDC preview searched the system with Spotlight and found a mention of ZFS. He says: "There is no file system bundle for it, nor is there a mount utility or any other one (no fsck, now newfs, etc.). There is, however, a changed vnode.h."
Thread beginning with comment 155188
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: This does not mean a thing
by Thom_Holwerda on Wed 23rd Aug 2006 15:18
in reply to "RE[3]: This does not mean a thing"
Member since:2005-06-29
That doesn't prevent MS from simply keeping the defines for other archs for people that still target the old architectures in one way or another.
Exactly. Other than that, what if a high-profile customer wants a custom version of NT to run it on a non-x86 architecture? Do you think Microsoft would not help them out?
In fact, that's how NT got ported to that Clipper architecture.
Edited 2006-08-23 15:26
Recent Original Stories
Recent Comments
Headlines
Random Comments
Random Stories
Random OS Link
Member since:
2005-08-26
That doesn't prevent MS from simply keeping the defines for other archs for people that still target the old architectures in one way or another.