Linked by Kroc on Thu 24th Aug 2006 20:26 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 155765
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-08-09
> Motorola 68000 were not truly 32 bit processors:
Truly? There is no such things as truly or not truly cpu ^_^
68000 has full 32bit ISA (7 years ahead of intel), who cares what was under the hood? !!!
Do you need 32bit address bus for a couple of megabytes of RAM? NO!!! It would be just a waste of transistors.
32bit ALU did not fit in their transistor budget, so 32bit data was processed in 2 chunks in 16bit alu.
Pentium4 also has 16 bit ALU, so why you didn't call it 16 bit cpu????