Linked by Eugenia Loli-Queru on Fri 25th Aug 2006 23:55 UTC
Windows Vista will be the last version of Windows that exists in its current, monolithic form, according to Gartner. Instead, the research firm predicts, Microsoft will be forced to migrate Windows to a modular architecture tied together through hardware-supported virtualisation. "The current, integrated architecture of Microsoft Windows is unsustainable - for enterprises and for Microsoft," wrote Gartner analysts Brian Gammage, Michael Silver and David Mitchell Smith.
Thread beginning with comment 156139
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Funny
by someone on Sat 26th Aug 2006 20:20 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: Funny"
someone
Member since:
2006-01-12

Yes, of course, I don't like BSD and Linux when it comes to GUI programming. I can't stand GTK and QT.

Are you sure you've never heard of Glade and QTDesigner? They've been around for years and years. Both generate XML files to be loaded during runtime. Few people hand code their GUI nowadays. If you don't like C/C++, you can use GTK#, Koala, Java-gnome, pygtk etc.

As for Mac OS X, Vista still doesn't have the equivalent of CoreImage, CoreAudio, CoreData and certainly CoreAnimation. Although there are fewer changes between OS X releases due to its frequency, I am sure you will find Leopard (will be released around Vista's time) revolutionary compared to Cheetah (released around XP's time).

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE[5]: Funny
by n4cer on Sat 26th Aug 2006 23:26 in reply to "RE[4]: Funny"
n4cer Member since:
2005-07-06

As for Mac OS X, Vista still doesn't have the equivalent of CoreImage, CoreAudio, CoreData and certainly CoreAnimation.

Windows has a superset of those technologies. The capabilities of Core Audio, Image, and Animation have been covered by DirectX for years. Likewise, ADO has covered the same scenarios as CoreData.

In Vista, all of these technologies and more are simplified and woven into WinFX.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE[6]: Funny
by rayiner on Sun 27th Aug 2006 01:25 in reply to "RE[5]: Funny"
rayiner Member since:
2005-07-06

DirectX does *not* do the equivalent of Core*. If you think it does, you're either unfamilar with DirectX, Core*, or both...

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1