To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I must admit to being quite interested in the Blue eyed OS project in the past – however, Ubuntu is here and Blue eyed OS is not
I was interested in it too. The Blue Eyed OS developer actually had an XWindow article here years ago. He seemed to have a firm grasp on optimizing the hell out of it.
and the author is possibly right why not use the Linux kernel to build something truly modern and different.
I don't know why it's not done, and why everybody is so consumed with copying windows. I imagine something like squeak http://squeak.org, but with a beautiful, hardware-accelerated interface, where every part of the desktop is completely extendible. Or maybe something built on top of Lisp, with a easy to use DSL for scripting the entire environment, where it would be easy to basically build any kind of desktop that you want, with little COM-like objects for putting together apps.




Member since:
2006-02-22
I think picking on Ubuntu was just a way of getting attention – it’s obvious what he was saying about Ubuntu could have applied in parts to any distro, even SUSE which seems to be going more in the direction he wants.
So has he got any good points? I don’t know, it seems to me what he wants is someone to take Linux and reinvent it – make it into something like OSX out of it. Could Gnome or KDE be better, well I quite like the Gnome in Ubuntu but it could be better even if it is quite fun with compiz added.
I must admit to being quite interested in the Blue eyed OS project in the past – however, Ubuntu is here and Blue eyed OS is not and the author is possibly right why not use the Linux kernel to build something truly modern and different.
PS As some who has to use MS Access at work, I have to say it would be nice if it ran on Ubuntu.