To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
You brought in the difference between windows and linux when upgrading.
Linux is anal about separating *DATA* from *APPS* to the upgrade path is easier. I'm yet to see a guide that doesn't separate the two.
Windows due to the registry because the registry has its own cruft problems, a fresh install was always a good idea.
Windows also is reliant on installers some of which leave directories with files in etc.
Windows because of spyware/adware etc for some reason leaves those things lying around for some reason, running in the background.
Because all the sources come from the same source. *I* on my linux simply run a little program to identify cruft on my computer. Their are even similar programs on windows that monitor the installs, try and identify other cruft, but clearly thats a different matter.
In this instance its not booting, in linux you are allowed several copies of the various updates, you do not have to roll-up and roll-back. In fact the closest argument to comparing linux to windows is deciding whether to use "make oldconfig"
Windows is moving towards the Linux way trying to put all software updates from various 2rd party companies though a common portal.
I'm a little concerned that you make the statement "clean install install is always better" which as much as it used to be true back in the days when you got software in boxes, the modern world software requires e-mail conformation, activation, which is *painful*






Member since:
2006-08-22
As with all upgrades. You always come out with a better result if you start with a clean sheet.