Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 5th Sep 2006 19:43 UTC, submitted by MatzeLoCal
Thread beginning with comment 159403
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-11-16
Didn't IBM massively cut its AIX workforce when they moved to Linux so as to take advantage of the free labor that produces Linux?
I remember being told in 2001 that IBM will replace AIX with Linux in 2004 (roughly), didn't happen.
Today, majority of SMP POWER-system users run AIX, although Redhat and SuSE enterprise versions are 'certified' on POWER, and IBM contributes code to make sure Linux kernel runs well on POWER.
I can think of many reasons for IBM to have an in-house OS to keep pace with the innovation on POWER (RAS, virtualization, performance, etc).