To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
"only the boot loader which is no different than any other version of Windows."
Simply a lie.
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/windowsvista/library/85cd5efe-c349...
oh and a fun quote
Windows Vista introduces a new boot loader architecture; a new firmware-independent boot configuration and storage system called Boot Configuration Data (BCD); and a new boot option editing tool, BCDEdit (BCDEdit.exe). These components are designed to load Windows more quickly and more securely.
The traditional Windows NT boot loader, Ntldr, is replaced by Windows Boot Manager (Bootmgr.exe) and a set of system-specific boot loaders. In the new configuration, Windows Boot Manager is generic and unaware of the specific requirements for each operating system, and each system-specific boot loader is optimized for the system that it loads.
""only the boot loader which is no different than any other version of Windows."
Simply a lie. "
Thats interesting because I've installed Beta 2 and the pre-rc1 build without it hosing my Linux install. It wiped out grub but after reinstalling grub Linux boots just fine. I can also boot into Vista from grub without any issues.
"only the boot loader which is no different than any other version of Windows."
Simply a lie.
Reading through the thread history, I think that the clause "which is no different than any other version of Windows" was intended to refer to the hosing of the boot loader, which Vista apparently does have in common with any other version of Windows (and which was the topic of discussion at the time). Calling something a lie without any evidence is flamebait because it says that the poster is not just incorrect but also dishonest. For this reason, your post should have been modded down, not up, even though it included interesting information.







Member since:
2005-07-06
only the boot loader which is no different than any other version of Windows.