Linked by Daniel W. Steinbrook on Thu 7th Sep 2006 06:14 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 160204
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: A few notes about the LiveCD
by BurningShadow on Thu 7th Sep 2006 19:20
in reply to "RE: A few notes about the LiveCD"
BitTorrent can't replace the current way of doing it, but ofcause I could use both.
mallard: I tried that in the beginning, but I didn't have any luck. But there's another place, I'm going to try.
I really don't see the current hosting as a problem. It's stable, and it's fast enough to be usefull.
The current LiveCD can mount fat, ext2 and ntfs partitions, so people can play their own music and video.





Member since:
2006-01-06
>About the lack of media files... Last months alone, I
>had more than 100GB traffic on the LiveCD. Adding just
>5MByte of media (a bit of audio, and video), would
>increase that by 15%. It's not easy to get something
>hosted, that takes 100GB/month, The company currently
>hosting it is a very understanding one, but adding 15%
>just isn't something that is going to happen, in the
>near future.
You could host the project on SourceForge, they already have TB's of traffic, you wouldn't even make a dent.