Linked by Eugenia Loli on Fri 8th Sep 2006 04:10 UTC
Benchmarks "Oh sure, the following tests aren't as scientific as putting all the browsers in a ring and seeing which one is left standing after the fight, but it's close." More here.
Thread beginning with comment 160424
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Konqueror's image
by Terracotta on Fri 8th Sep 2006 09:08 UTC
Member since:

Yesterday an article about what Konqueror is about, and today an article that states that Konqueror beats all when it comes to performance. KDE's marketing-machine running? Ah well it is a great browser anyway and has come a long way the last 1,5 year (probably apples' webkit has something to do with it as well: more people working on (almost) the same code). Too bad so many sites want you to change the ID to firefox to get all the html-code, not really Konqueror's fault, because it can run the sites when the ID is changed. I hope at least google is going to recognise that konqueror can show their sites, they're supposed to be open minded towards open source.

Reply Score: 1

RE: Konqueror's image
by gustl on Fri 8th Sep 2006 12:08 in reply to "Konqueror's image"
gustl Member since:

It is the reason why I like Konqueror so much as a Web-Browser:

- Speedy startup compared to Firefox (at least for us KDE users).
- Fast rendering.

However, there still are some sites, who insist on using bad java/javascript/flash code. For these I will start up firefox (and kmail, to make their webmaster become aware of their errors ;) ).

Reply Parent Score: 2