Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 10th Sep 2006 18:01 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 161232
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
No new "multi-core" benchmarks please
by Wes Felter on Mon 11th Sep 2006 19:41
in reply to "Time for some new benchmarks"
Tom's Hardware is using real programs as benchmarks, which is how things should be done. If real desktop programs can't use 4 cores, then they can't and customers need to know that. (Of course, I expect other results will show that real server apps can effectively use lots of cores.) Special multi-core optimized benchmarks just mislead customers (but they'll probably benefit the chip vendors).






Member since:
2005-07-22
I think that a number of the current benchmarks are going to be made slightly redundant by the arrival of multi(>2) core processors.
I wonder if this is why the results don't show the expected performance gains when using 4 cores?
so, where is the TPC-C ( or other) type benchmark for these systems. They sure keep the CPU busy.