Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 14th Sep 2006 16:00 UTC, submitted by Sonia Mehta
Apple "I want Vista to be a better OS than it's been promoted to be, but at the same time, I also want OS X to finally receive the public adoption that it deserves. Now is the time for Apple to creatively promote its Macintosh platform with OS X. This is the critical hour, and if Apple is able to take advantage of the uneasy feeling that many have towards Vista, then they could attract an untold amount of new users."
Thread beginning with comment 162586
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: What will really happen.
by danq on Fri 15th Sep 2006 02:39 UTC in reply to "RE: What will really happen."
danq
Member since:
2005-07-29

No FUD here.

I am a former Linux user. If you check out my Web site, I support the free software movement and Creative Commons. As a libertarian, I am also very much opposed to intellectual "property" and Microsoft's politics. I am the maintainer of the GNU/DOS distribution of FreeDOS, and have developed a number of smaller GPLed applications and games, some of which run on Linux.

Linux has (especially since Kernel 2.6, newer versions of KDE, Gnome 2 and Slackware's decision to drop it, ALSA, OpenOffice, and other recent developments) been extremely frustrating for me. This is just personal experience. I have used RedHat, Slackware, Arch, Ubuntu, and perhaps others I can't think of right now.
While I used to like Linux, I am no longer happy with any of them. One may support my wireless card while another might not, one might not autoconfigure X properly while another will, and one doesn't let me use the sound in YouTube Flash videos while another does not work with my sound card at all. Not to mention shutdown problems with APM that require a kernel recompile, etc. Just a total mess and lack of coordination when I can simply turn on a Windows machine which, despite its problems which are easily fixed through quick installations of third party programs such anti-virus, anti-spyware, and alternate browsers like Firefox, is worth paying for, and use it.
Not to mention the fact that Linux is much slower, especially the OpenOffice program (why did they choose Java of all languages to write such a critical component in?)

If you like all that work, no problem. But if you're like most computer users and want a computer that simply "works out of the box," Windows is the best choice unless Apple lowers their prices.

Reply Parent Score: 1

Nephelim Member since:
2006-07-26

I simply do not believe you. If you have the skills that you tell us you do, configuring things like the ones you talk abount should be a no matter at all. Besides, what are you talking abount OpenOffice being coded in Java ?

Reply Parent Score: 1

flywheel Member since:
2005-12-28

I don't know about Gnome, I don't care about Gnome.

About the rest of your rant - there's really nothing here I can recognize.

Regarding the startuptime of OO.O - AFAIR there is no quick start functionality in the Linux version as there is in Windows.
Second, OpenOffice org is not written in Java - its only when you use the DBMS, whose backend is Java-based, that you are correct. Actually if you do not use the OO.O-Base DBMS you do not even need to have a JRE installed.

Reply Parent Score: 1