Linked by Eugenia Loli-Queru on Fri 15th Sep 2006 22:48 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 162843
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I think that you are mischaracterizing Microsoft's intentions with respect to DirectX and .NET. MDX and XNA do not replace DirectX--they are essentially wrappers for it. Those wrappers are not at least currently intended to replace the development of applications with C++.






Member since:
2006-01-16
Why not Q5 in Java?
http://www.bytonic.de/html/jake2.html
This is far from insanely slow, it's just showing decent performance, I tried it out myself.
Microsoft even wants to replace DirectX with a managed environment.