Linked by Eugenia Loli on Sat 16th Sep 2006 07:30 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 163073
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-23
Eclipse as a whole is friggin awesome. However, the shortcomings of some of the projects has nothing to do with Eclipse itself, but the people who develop projects on top of it. On the plus side, you have BIRT and the Java IDE, you can see the potential that it has. Then there are the incredibly horrible UML and C++ IDE's, and you just have to shake your head. People tend to forget that Eclipse is a platform for applications, not just an IDE. The failings of some projects built on Eclipse is in no way a reflection of Eclipse itself.