Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 17th Sep 2006 21:22 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 163293
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
None of that relieves Apple of responsibility when failures DO occur.
No where did I say Apple is relieved of responsibility. Apple in fact is taking responsibility.
Do you have proof that they are blaming Intel or are not diagnosing the issue or even not working on fixes?
Absent such evidence you can't claim that Apple isn't doing the needful. I questioned the notion that Apple didn't do enough QA.




Member since:
2006-01-06
You are making a fatal assumption, that enough QA will always find problems that occur in the field. No company on this planet can have a QA test matrix large enough to handle ever single scenario a customer can put a product through.
Problems can and do happen in the field no matter how good your engineering and system building proccess. Multi-symptom problems are hard to diagnose. Especially if there are marginal parts in manufacturing or the process itself.
None of that relieves Apple of responsibility when failures DO occur.
So far there is no data that Apple is ignoring the problem.
Let's hope that Apple continues to be as responsive.