To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Actually, Java on the browser/client part is only there to connect, view and control the "remote Desktop": should be pretty thin.
To be honest, i don't see anything particularly new - there is already a lot of software today of this kind, just not a browser-based java app.
http://www.workspot.net/
Lightweight encrypted VNC client in Java connecting to remote hosted linux, for a few dollars a month.
Nothing to do with me, I used it for a while a couple of years back. Just posted it to show this is nothing new.
Java is so bad for me in Firefox/Win that I have it completely disabled in the browser. I'd rather use IE for Java. On the Mac, conversely, Java works well for me.
Edit: What I forgot to add was that Ulteo ought to use FreeNX as a base and use ICA for traffic. ICA is generally much smaller and more efficient than a bulky Java app, and there are already implementations of the official Citrix client and FreeNX on several platforms.
Citrix says you need something like 11K to have working session (which means dial up COULD work), and with broadband (really only about 50K), you're speeding.
Edited 2006-09-26 13:18






Member since:
2006-03-16
My experience with running Java apps inside a web browser
has been terrible. It's so bad that I want no part of
Java when it comes to using a browser.
For example, I can get Firefox to play nice with these
Java-based games Yahoo Games. Firefox (with Sun's JRE)
crashes like crazy adn IE is only slightly better. If it
has trouble with things like simple games, how am I
suppose to have confidence for serious apps?
I would rather they write a standalone cross-platform
client in Java instead.