Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 27th Sep 2006 23:06 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 166267
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Perhaps Microsoft are still altering the API as we type, or haven't gotten around to documenting it ... neither is without precedent or irony.
Microsofts success is based on the range of third party applications available. Witness the number of users who almost switch to Linux or BSD but cannot live without a particular application. So it is clearly in Microsoft interest to be open with their developers who also provide a convenient group of beta testers.
The facing up between Microsoft and Symantec is curious because they are both megabucks corporations and the rest of us get grandstand views of it. MS have a bad (legally proven) track record of skulduggery with anti virus stuff so this could get interesting.





Member since:
2005-07-06
Um ...
It *IS* their operating system. Doesn't it stand to reason that Microsoft themselves would have a head-start on any and all development of system-level add-ons?