To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
> not allowing users to save images to the SD card really make me wonder how much usability testing this phone went through
My guess is that they re-used the software for another Samsung phone that did not have a card slot. I can't think of any other reason why the option is not there. But yes, proper testing would have found this flaw.
> What image options are available when taking photos?
Zoom, effects, flash, multishot, ISO options, autofocus off/on etc.
>If they offer options, how big are the best quality photos?
Just look at the camera images I have in the article. They are all taken with the highest quality/res settings and they are transfered here unmodified.
I'll tell you why they didn't offer to save photos to the Sd card, it's evident tome from the start; if they offer this function people don't use network services (email, MMS etc..) and as such this feature does not generate any revenue for the network operator, hence no interest in the product.
Phones are crippled because the network operator is buying the phone, not you.






Member since:
2006-04-06
Things like including a 3.2MP camera and not allowing users to save images to the SD card really make me wonder how much usability testing this phone went through. I can see getting annoyed very quickly if I take a series of photos and run out of room because I haven't popped off to the file manager to move my photos over to the SD slot (manually).
Sigh. It seems like it has some of the pieces to be a great feature phone, but they haven't put them together properly.
What image options are available when taking photos? If they offer options, how big are the best quality photos?