Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 28th Sep 2006 22:44 UTC, submitted by csousa
Thread beginning with comment 166753
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: What exactly is the problem here?
by korpenkraxar on Sat 30th Sep 2006 09:25
in reply to "What exactly is the problem here?"





Member since:
2006-01-01
For a long time Mozilla was OK with what Debian did with Firefox. But now they have suddenly found that they are not OK with it and they want Debian to rebrand the Firefox version that Debian packages. Debian answers that all right, we'll rebrand it if that is what you wish.
Then suddenly there's a 100 posts at OSNews, with a large percentage of them saying that they don't like how Debian always fights with others (and with itself) and that this dispute with Mozilla proves that Debian is ripping itself apart with its petty politics.
I don't get it. Debian complies to Mozilla's demands and promises to rebrand Firefox. Where's the argument here, where's the dispute? It seems to me that Mozilla and Debian have found an easy agreement. How exactly is Debian ripping itself apart by changing the name of the Firefox version that they package?
Anyway, my suggestion is that Debian should rebrand Firefox to Hotdog. I'd rather browse the Web with Hotdog than with Firefox. :-P