Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 1st Oct 2006 19:45 UTC, submitted by rx182
Thread beginning with comment 167326
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Bugzilla entries have date stamps, its very easy to see when the bug was reported and when it was fixed. That's a pretty transparent process.
Are you saying they file new bugs for old security issues, just to get the fix date close to the report date? What happens to the original bugzilla entry?
>> Are you saying they file new bugs for old
>> security issues, just to get the fix date close
>> to the report date? What happens to the original
>> bugzilla entry?
It goes 'unconfirmed'... Like the 'memory leak' that was revealed to be a 'feature' and has multiple bug entries dating back all the way to FF 0.89
That it seems even 2.0 RC1 STILL HAS.
Of course, if it's a feature, why do other browsers lack it?






Member since:
2005-11-06
Actually most Firefox security issues are known long before a patch is issued. They make the flaws public one day before the patch to give the impression that they are fast patching... The reality is that these errors have been known in black hat forums for months. Mozilla does nothing.