Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 3rd Oct 2006 18:50 UTC
SuSE, openSUSE OpenSUSE 10.2 will no longer user ReiserFS as its default filesystem. "We've been using ReiserFS as our default installation file system for the last 6-7 years now, and it's served us well in that time. Unfortunately, there are a number of problems with it, some purely technical, some more related to maintenance. I'll outline a few of the larger issues and offer my solution as a conclusion."
Thread beginning with comment 167977
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: good decision
by segedunum on Tue 3rd Oct 2006 23:04 UTC in reply to "RE: good decision"
segedunum
Member since:
2005-07-06

...but ReiserFS kept destroying my data while ext3 never failed once. So I'd say ext3 is way beyond relatively safe.

You hear various stories like this from people about all filesystems - ext3 destroyed my data, Reiser destroyed my data, XFS destroyed my data....... They're utterly meaningless.

They're generally made by people who get paranoid about what happens if they have a power failure, and they pull the power cord on their machine to test it and whinge when it doesn't come back up. Such comments don't apply.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 5

RE[3]: good decision
by No it isnt on Wed 4th Oct 2006 11:50 in reply to "RE[2]: good decision"
No it isnt Member since:
2005-11-14

True. On my Powerbook, I've run both Linux and OS X, and the latter will regularly destroy its root FS unrecoverably. With Linux, which had to run ext2 for its root FS, and usually had ReiserFS for the others, I've only had one unrecoverable error -- a minor one on ext2 that made e2fsck segfault, while the FS was still readable. A simple copy, reinitialize and restore fixed the problem.

So my experience says HFS+ w/journaling < ext2 < ReiserFS 3, and the same for their respective fscks. Most other people would say e2fsck is one of the more robust programs out there, and reiserfsck doesn't have the same reputation. Also, saying that HFS+ with journaling is as stable as nitroglyserin is clearly contradicted by all those Mac users who seem perfectly happy with it.

My guess is that hardware weirdness will have different consequences for different FSs, and ReiserFS isn't necessarily the worst. My own experience with it has always been positive.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE[3]: good decision
by biteydog on Wed 4th Oct 2006 11:52 in reply to "RE[2]: good decision"
biteydog Member since:
2005-10-06

Yabut.....We live in a snow-prone mountain area and in winter have frequent power-outs. Have never suffered data loss on ext3, Reiser or XFS due to these (or anything else), which are all on our server in different partitions for different types of data - so I don't see that pulling the cord would do it either.

Not really arguing - just a bit confused by your comment.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1