Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 4th Oct 2006 20:13 UTC, submitted by elsewhere
Thread beginning with comment 168384
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Frankly, it already IS easy for people to activate -- because they DON'T have to do so. As the article says, most people get their copies of Windows when they buy a new machine. Retail (ie. shrinkwrap) upgrades comprise less than 1% of all OS sales for MS, according to statistics. This is a tempest in a teacup. It's primarily aimed at keeping graybox vendors honest.




Member since:
2005-06-29
Right... I'm all against piracy and I would say that it is a good measure to reduce the functionality of the OS when not activated. BUT as I'm saying there's a big BUT: make it easy for people to activate their copy. Even if they reinstall or whatever just make activation a straigtforward non-obtrusive process. That way loyal customers won't be annoyed and pirates will experience reduced functionaly. But that would only happen in a perfect world tbh so I don't think this would work out okay due to nature of an operating system - you're given access to binaries and we all know that sooner or later it is going to be cracked. So what I'm going for is just make it as easy as possible for the paying clients to be your customers.