Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 5th Oct 2006 20:49 UTC, submitted by Eugenia
Thread beginning with comment 168864
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Ubuntu and proprietary software
by sbergman27 on Thu 5th Oct 2006 21:49
in reply to "RE[4]: Ubuntu and proprietary software"
"""So again, proprietary drivers are in a different restricted repository but installed by default."""
Installed but not used. Unless you have a concrete example of proprietary software being used without the user's consent, I simply have to declare this argument as one not worth having.
Does proprietary software sitting on a disk, unused, make the user "dirty"? If a tree falls in the forest and no one is there to hear it, is there a sound? How many angels can dance on the head of a pin?
Edited 2006-10-05 21:52
RE[6]: Ubuntu and proprietary software
by manmist on Thu 5th Oct 2006 21:55
in reply to "RE[5]: Ubuntu and proprietary software"
RE[6]: Ubuntu and proprietary software
by Sphinx on Fri 6th Oct 2006 01:43
in reply to "RE[5]: Ubuntu and proprietary software"





Member since:
2005-12-18
It doesnt clarify anything to me. Go read http://www.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/licensing. Read the section titled "Software installed by default". Note that it says that "binary only" hardware drivers are installed by default even though they are marked as restricted.
So again, proprietary drivers are in a different restricted repository but installed by default. It might not be used in the configuration. I make no claims about that. It is a fact that proprietary stuff gets installed by default without a choice.
Edited 2006-10-05 21:45