Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 5th Oct 2006 20:44 UTC, submitted by jasper
Thread beginning with comment 169197
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.





Member since:
2005-07-06
http://www.affero.org/oagpl.html
"This license is a modified version of the GNU General Public License"
...
"The GPL is not the only license with the same requirements"
Yes , the other do cherry picking.
"in fact I could go write one now with the same exact requirements and yet another one would exist and it still wouldn't be the GPL. "
You said it exist ( you picked a GPL modification ) ... now you say you have to go make one ...
"You really need to research your licenses... "
You really need to make a valid , factual and accurate point.
I am still waiting for something that is not the GPL or a modification of it that prove your false point. That exist today and is in use. ( yes I added some requirement , because one need to be extremely precise with you apparently ).
Its not in the similarities that the GPL as value its in the details and difference.