Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 7th Oct 2006 17:48 UTC, submitted by J.
Thread beginning with comment 169568
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Howdy
I really think you`ll find that big distros will stick to the "official" tree backed by a large corperation and that individuals will probably use the "storm" version.
As for forking = bad well just think about those developers stopping all development due to their frustrations, basically everyone looses in that case and some duplicated effort is not such a bad thing really and if you look at ALL the Linux distro's kernels for instance you`ll see that sometimes 2 or 3 ways of doing things gives another an idea that eventually emerges as the "right way".




Member since:
2006-01-22
I am all for choice too. However, my concern with Beryl is that its popularity due to its features will cause it to become a "standard." How many pieces of the linux system do we routinely shake are heads at and wish they were designed better from the start? How many limitations will we regret having not done right the first time? Personally, I say stick with the quality code and build it *right* rather than now.