To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
You dont have to like "PJ"... the library of legal/ezine/articles of data they have compiled on groklaw vastly outweighs any slant "PJ" might have.
I dont like PJ either (her blind devotion to the FSF really irks me)... But Groklaw stands without "her".
You still didnt offer anything to rebut any information on groklaw.
Oh LOL.
Yes, she is biased. And she's being VERY honest about it. But what is MORE important, is that she provide LINKS to articles, so you can see it for yourself.
Being biased is not bad, _IF_ you're honest about it, and your bias stems from _objective_ reasons. PJ's bias stems from objective reasons - the articles she links to, proves that.
And she doesn't hide, she is writing HER view on the subjects, so she is also honest. That's more than you can say about most others, incl. Redhat and Microsoft (both are twisting the truth in their ads).
//Because PJ is not much of a journalist and has a strong bias against Microsoft. These are the reaons I do not visit Groklaw.//
So you are saying that you prefer the "head in the sand, hands on ears, la la la la I can't hear you" approach?
Groklaw quotes from legal documents. This is not a bias.





Member since:
2005-07-06
Because PJ is not much of a journalist and has a strong bias against Microsoft. These are the reaons I do not visit Groklaw.