Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 9th Oct 2006 17:30 UTC, submitted by JCooper
SCO, Caldera, Unixware A declaration by SCO's backer, BayStar has revealed that the software Giant Microsoft had more links to the anti-Linux bad-boy. The declaration made by from BayStar general partner Larry Goldfarb has turned up as part of IBM's evidence to the court. Goldfarb says that Baystar had been chucking USD 50 million at SCO despite concerns that it had a high cash burn rate. He also claims that former Microsoft senior VP for corporate development and strategy Richard Emerson discussed "a variety of investment structures wherein Microsoft would 'backstop', or guarantee in some way, BayStar's investment". Thanks to The Inq for the summary.
Thread beginning with comment 170033
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Groklaw?
by NotParker on Mon 9th Oct 2006 20:28 UTC in reply to "RE: Groklaw?"
NotParker
Member since:
2006-06-01

May I kindly ask why I shouldn't trust an article on Groklaw?

Pamela Jones (a pseudonym I think) the founder of Groklaw "took a job as director of litigation risk research at indemnification firm Open Source Risk Management in February 2004, but resigned in November 2004 after a speaker at a SCO road show in the UK suggested there was a conflict of interest in an anti-SCO campaigner working for a Linux indemnification firm."

http://www.cbronline.com/article_news.asp?guid=91D095F4-556D-4EB7-8...

Reply Parent Score: -1

RE[3]: Groklaw?
by dylansmrjones on Mon 9th Oct 2006 21:06 in reply to "RE[2]: Groklaw?"
dylansmrjones Member since:
2005-10-02

PJ is her real name, and no pseudonym.

Have you any thing that indicates it's a pseudonym or are you just trolling again, as usual?

All your posts are biased and DIShonest at the same time. That makes you so sleazy that I have to give you the "Bo Warming"-mark (search google on him).

PJ have already months ago handled the OSRM-issue and didn't hide anything.

The mere fact she stepped back, proves she has quite a bit of credibility.

She may be biased, but she always provides links so you can see for yourself. I don't follow her all the way on the FSF-issue (the FSF-agenda tends to be slightly disturbing to me), but she's doing quite a good job on digging up information.

Reply Parent Score: 2