Linked by Eugenia Loli-Queru on Tue 10th Oct 2006 08:51 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 170334
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I don't think web services will _ever_ replace running local applications on a stand-alone pc. They will keep supplementing each other, but that's it.
Moving entirely to web services would require a level of quality service guarantees and bandwidth that simply isn't possible right now.
Personally I have doubts it will ever be possible. There will be always be a need for applications capable of running without having network access.
True, the need may decline, but it will not disappear. Anyway, I think people should concentrate on making the "worlds" supplement eachother even better, enhancing both of them.
Usually great break-throughs come from combining technologies and not replacing them.






Member since:
2005-10-02
*cough*Web2.0*cough* *cough*is*cough* BULLSHIT*cough*
To be hones, anybody mentioning Web 2.0 in their articles lose any credibility in my eyes.
However, I think people consider sliced bread so good because you don't have to slice the bread yourself.
Not that I can see any particular problem with slicing it yourself, but what else could it be?
Anyway... Honey Ale from any microbrew easily beats sliced bread
...
Back to the article. It was pretty much a lot of irrelevant nonsens. No true content. No jabs at Microsoft, no jabs at anyone, no nothing at all.
I don't think web services will _ever_ replace running local applications on a stand-alone pc. They will keep supplementing each other, but that's it.