Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 9th Oct 2006 17:30 UTC, submitted by JCooper
Thread beginning with comment 170430
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-10-02
I apologize for assuming you had reading and comprehension abilities and therefore thought it was enough to point to the article for FUD example.
Oh, I have those all right. I can also see her bias in her analysises, but that bias does not make it FUD. It only makes it a biased analysis.
FUD != bias.
What I didn't feel like doing was dig up the example of PJ outright lying.
Now it sounds like there was only one incident of lying, while earlier you claimed there were out right lies EVERYWHERE on Groklaw. It's easy enough to find out right lies if they are everywhere, but now even you admit this is not the case.
So basically, you're withdrawing your earlier statement. If you don't want to spend time backing up your withdrawn claim, then of course neither will I.