To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
If he is a bot , then I have been really fooled.
Thanks... that one made me laugh
(and perhaps he is a bot.. I dare not say for sure).
I'm not exploding in a tremendous rage, just slightly annoyed. Tremendous rage is a very big thing, and something that rarely happens for me.
There are so many open source and Free Software alternatives to PC-BSD that the loss of it wouldn't be so bad. So I'll just lean back and relax.
It's actually very easy to create a fork - the problem is to maintain the fork. Just like it is easy to create a distribution, but difficult to maintain it (the latter is a huge job).
Forks are easy under the BSD _if_ you have the code. We have the FreeBSD code used in PC-BSD and we have code to replace the PBI-system, so we're not in trouble. But personally I don't think PC-BSD will go closed-source. That's unlikely in my eyes. But if it did, it would do little or no harm to the community. It _is_ replaceable.




"
Member since:
2005-10-02
Relax dude... I'm a Gentoo user myself (and Windows and OS/2/eCS, and Syllable, SkyOS, AROS and Haiku), and generally prefer GPL over the BSD-license, but relax.
R e l a x .
The only special thing in PC-BSD is the PBI system, and it's not exactly revolutionary. There are several GPL'ed variations on the same theme, so who cares if a bsd-licensed version goes down? If PC-BSD goes closed source, we can just create a new one based on FreeBSD and utilize GNU software to replace PBI.
There is no reason to panic. Relax.
I am not lying, nor am I exploding in a tremendous rage (and how would you know?). However, I am somewhat humoured by your claim that I should be.
BTW: Are you related to NotParker in any way?
Edited 2006-10-10 21:33