Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 11th Oct 2006 20:09 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 170919
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: proofreader snaps, film at 11
by ThawkTH on Wed 11th Oct 2006 21:02
in reply to "proofreader snaps, film at 11"
RE[2]: proofreader snaps, film at 11
by Thom_Holwerda on Wed 11th Oct 2006 21:04
in reply to "proofreader snaps, film at 11"
RE[3]: proofreader snaps, film at 11
by AdamW on Wed 11th Oct 2006 21:29
in reply to "RE[2]: proofreader snaps, film at 11"
RE[3]: proofreader snaps, film at 11
by Terracotta on Wed 11th Oct 2006 22:06
in reply to "RE[2]: proofreader snaps, film at 11"
"Come back and complain in such a rude manner when YOU speak 3 languages fluently, and can understand 4."
Not like it's that hard... He doesn't have to react that rude, but the defence is rather poor.
Edit: Typo grmbl, there goes my attack, lol.
Edited 2006-10-11 22:08
RE[3]: proofreader snaps, film at 11
by rcsteiner on Thu 12th Oct 2006 15:42
in reply to "RE[2]: proofreader snaps, film at 11"
One can speak a language (or three) fluently and still make serious mistakes in usage from time to time, so multi-language fluency is not really meaningful in the context of this discussion.
FWIW, though, your usage is correct as far as I'm concerned, so don't sweat it. Folks who harp in public about grammatical errors often do so because they have little else to contibute. :-(






Member since:
2005-07-06
TRANSITION IS NOT A f--kING VERB.