To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: FreeBSD is not an alternative to GNU/Linux
"It gives *more* rights"
No ...
"Software ... Australia"
Then why does he use BSD as a license as everyone knows people can take BSD code , add minimaly to it and close it for all others.
"FreeBSD will soon have better hardware support since they are starting to include binary drivers in their system"
Hardware support is done by the vendor , I havent seen any vendor claiming to add support or wanting to add support in the futur for BSD , quite the opposite ...
"not the we-love-freedom-but-still-we-want-video-acceleration Linux community"
Who do you think where the first to split from xfree when it changed license ? BSD ? , oh wait they still use that , its not because some commecial GNU/linux vendor make it more integrated that everyone does it as default , most of them push the Free version first when one is availaible.
You can bulshit all you whant , your best hope is Apple
and its screwing your community everyday , we have more then one multinationnal to fall back on and they are not out to screw us , they add to the pool of software not take from it and remove access to there improvements.



Member since:
2005-08-08
> My answer is no FreeBSD cannot be a replacement for GNU/Linux , it as les software , less hardware support , less Freedom , less rights given.
It gives *more* rights. Quoting Theo de Raadt:
"Software [...] must be free to all (be they people or companies), for any purpose they wish to use it, including modification, use, peeing on, or even integration into baby mulching machines or atomic bombs to be dropped on Australia."
Otherwise, FreeBSD will soon have better hardware support since they are starting to include binary drivers in their system (like... hmm... I wonder who came with this idea first ? Not the we-love-freedom-but-still-we-want-video-acceleration Linux community, of course.)