Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 23rd Oct 2006 14:38 UTC, submitted by Anonymous Reader
Benchmarks "A lot of people has been asking me about some performance comparison for the vector graphics framework we have. Rendering polygons, especially when we're dealing with stroke, tends to be the most expensive rendering operation performed in vector graphics. I constructed a little test, which tests raw polygon rendering power of Qt and Cairo. For the test I used the latest Qt main branch, and the master branch from Cairo's Git repository."
Thread beginning with comment 174210
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: "Polygone"?
by jebb on Mon 23rd Oct 2006 16:22 UTC in reply to "RE[4]: "Polygone"?"
jebb
Member since:
2006-07-06

Not sure updating a language is a good thing. Just look over the border and ask your German neighbours about their recent experience with it......

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[6]: "Polygone"?
by Thom_Holwerda on Mon 23rd Oct 2006 16:30 in reply to "RE[5]: "Polygone"?"
Thom_Holwerda Member since:
2005-06-29

Not sure updating a language is a good thing. Just look over the border and ask your German neighbours about their recent experience with it......

The problem with English spelling is that it's still stuck in the middle ages-- literally. English went through a major vowel shift in speech, but spelling never reflected that change.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[7]: "Polygone"?
by dylansmrjones on Mon 23rd Oct 2006 18:53 in reply to "RE[6]: "Polygone"?"
dylansmrjones Member since:
2005-10-02

Heh... Danish is even worse, not to mention Dutch ;) (Which one is worse is something I'll leave for other persons to decide... i'm afraid Danish is the worse one).

Reply Parent Score: 1