Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 26th Oct 2006 15:49 UTC, submitted by Governa
Thread beginning with comment 175688
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.





Member since:
2005-10-12
Its a really strange argument. When you run Office or Photoshop on a Mac, and print to an Epson printer, or maybe use a Minolta negative scanner, or backup to an external usb drive, or import from your Canon in raw, how exactly is this 'a system designed top to bottom'?
On the other hand, when you use Office over XP to interface to Exchange Server....maybe that really is a system designed top to bottom. At least in the respects that you might feel count, if any of them really do count.
This is just silliness. Not my own phrase, but we need to stop claiming as advantages things which the Mac does not have, and which would not be advantages even if they did.