Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 26th Oct 2006 16:19 UTC, submitted by Charles A Landemaine
PC-BSD "With all of the BSD variants available for download, it's easy to incorrectly assume all of them are pure, incompatible forks from each other. Actually, there are more shades of BSD out in the world than just separate forks. One in particular made the news a couple of weeks ago when it was commercially acquired. The BSD in question is PC-BSD. The company that bought it is iXsystems, a systems deployment and integrator firm out of San Jose that has pretty strong experience implementing *BSD, Unix and Linux systems for its customer base. So, why did the company up and buy PC-BSD?"
Thread beginning with comment 175921
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: Lets hope so
by Soulbender on Fri 27th Oct 2006 03:36 UTC in reply to "RE[5]: Lets hope so"
Soulbender
Member since:
2005-08-18

"FreeBSD is not as smooth as Linux on hardware."

That's a pretty widereaching conclusion to come to from trying to get it installed on one computer. I could say the same about Linux using my own experience (Ubuntu did not support my ralink wifi, openbsd did). Also, FreeBSD != BSD.

Edited 2006-10-27 03:37

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[7]: Lets hope so
by garymax on Fri 27th Oct 2006 03:44 in reply to "RE[6]: Lets hope so"
garymax Member since:
2006-01-23

But that's my point.

Any computer upon which Linux runs nicely and FreeBSD has problems is one more strike against the system.

Regardless of the reason for the difficulty, when Linux installs and works out of the box (several distros mind you) and FreeBSD chokes and is a pain to get working--if working at all, it is one more testimonial to the fact that FreeBSD has a way to go to reach parity with Linux in terms of ease of installation.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[7]: Lets hope so
by twenex on Fri 27th Oct 2006 08:54 in reply to "RE[6]: Lets hope so"
twenex Member since:
2006-04-21

I tried it on every system I could get my hands on. One major version even tanked before loading the install program (NetBSD 3.0). So don't give me the cookie-cutter argument, because it won't wash.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[8]: Lets hope so
by Soulbender on Fri 27th Oct 2006 09:52 in reply to "RE[7]: Lets hope so"
Soulbender Member since:
2005-08-18

"So don't give me the cookie-cutter argument, because it won't wash."

Funny then how I have been installing OpenBSD systems for a living for 6+ years on all kinds of brand and whitebox systems yet I have never had any major piece of hardware not be supported. Sure, there have been devices that wasn't initially supported because they where new or really oddball but this has always been fixed in newer versions. You know, just like how Linux (or any OS other than maybe Windows) doesn't magically support every new or existing piece of hardware 2 seconds after it is released or discovered.
So sorry, but "BSD has bad hardware support" is a blanket statement that doesn't wash.

Reply Parent Score: 3