To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
But that's my point.
Any computer upon which Linux runs nicely and FreeBSD has problems is one more strike against the system.
Regardless of the reason for the difficulty, when Linux installs and works out of the box (several distros mind you) and FreeBSD chokes and is a pain to get working--if working at all, it is one more testimonial to the fact that FreeBSD has a way to go to reach parity with Linux in terms of ease of installation.
"So don't give me the cookie-cutter argument, because it won't wash."
Funny then how I have been installing OpenBSD systems for a living for 6+ years on all kinds of brand and whitebox systems yet I have never had any major piece of hardware not be supported. Sure, there have been devices that wasn't initially supported because they where new or really oddball but this has always been fixed in newer versions. You know, just like how Linux (or any OS other than maybe Windows) doesn't magically support every new or existing piece of hardware 2 seconds after it is released or discovered.
So sorry, but "BSD has bad hardware support" is a blanket statement that doesn't wash.





Member since:
2005-08-18
"FreeBSD is not as smooth as Linux on hardware."
That's a pretty widereaching conclusion to come to from trying to get it installed on one computer. I could say the same about Linux using my own experience (Ubuntu did not support my ralink wifi, openbsd did). Also, FreeBSD != BSD.
Edited 2006-10-27 03:37