Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 28th Oct 2006 17:28 UTC, submitted by Tyr.
Windows "Leading PC manufacturer Acer has accused Microsoft of ratcheting up the cost of Windows by effectively forcing consumers to opt for the Premium version of Vista. Acer claims that the Vista Home Basic - the new entry-level Windows - is so poorly featured that consumers will simply reject it. "The new [Vista] experience you hear of, if you get Basic, you won't feel it at all," said Jim Wong, senior corporate vice president at Acer. "There's no [Aero] graphics, no Media Center, no remote control."
Thread beginning with comment 176512
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Alternative OS
by hraq on Sun 29th Oct 2006 07:19 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Alternative OS"
hraq
Member since:
2005-07-06

"6. No OEM is able to write stable device drivers for linux/BSD, and for which linux or BSD "

The device drivers included within the kernel tend generally to be basic at best; look eg to Creative Products from Sound Cards to Web Cameras. I cannot find a Creative linux drivers as advanced as in windows, and for web cameras nothing at all; then if Acer decided to include a web camera in their laptops they would be rejected by Creative, and Acer will write drivers for that particular web camera themselves, which would be very basic or otherwise they will waste tremendous resources on it, which would not happen because they are nagging about few dollars on vista copies in the first place.
So if devices' manufacturers don't support linux/BSD with drivers(as in the real life) then computer OEMs are left for the kernel's supplied drivers or their own version of drivers, which the latter would be buggy as they don't have the resources to master it for bunch of devices.

Even, a big name like ATI was and still unable to write a decent linux device drivers for the best known linux distros from Redhat or Novell. And for the same reason nvidia is much preffered for linux users, even though it's far from perfect.

Recently, I have installed nvidia supplied drivers for many linuxes, solaris and windows while benchmarking SPECviewperf 9 for the same computer with the same graphics card; and I have found that linux drivers tend to crash and when passed dave me low values than windows ,on contrary solaris gave a slower results than windows but was rock solid even on a beta version like 5.11.50B. So, whose mistake is it on linux? 100% it's nvidia.
It's all about drivers, look at pro vs consumer nvidia cards, physical difference is just 10%, while the major difference is in the drivers for the pro that makes these cards upto 4x the price of consumer cards.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[4]: Alternative OS - Drivers issue
by Shkaba on Sun 29th Oct 2006 19:22 in reply to "RE[3]: Alternative OS"
Shkaba Member since:
2006-06-22

witrhout getting into details I will point out just the following facts:

1 - The reason why there are some devices that have no drivers (or buggy drivers) for linux is because of the nature of linux and its opennes. In other words Some of the manufacturers do not like the fact that the driver has to be open source and scrutinized by kernel developers before its inclusion.

There is nothing, and I repeat nothing that prevents manufacturers from ceating decent drivers except for their unwillingnes. And they will remain unwilling until they are faced with a growing pressure from customers.

Reply Parent Score: 1