Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 29th Oct 2006 23:10 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 176858
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Windows Code is still a mess
by dylansmrjones on Mon 30th Oct 2006 16:35
in reply to "RE[4]: Windows Code is still a mess"
RE[6]: Windows Code is still a mess
by eggman on Mon 30th Oct 2006 16:54
in reply to "RE[5]: Windows Code is still a mess"






Member since:
2005-07-06
Microsoft has a lot bigger PR disaster on its hands than just the Register.
Whatever. There are other news orgs and actual users that don't have a problem. Many of the articles about the horrors of WGA/activation are pure speculation and mirror what was said about XP prior to its release, yet it is now the dominant client OS. Many of the virtualization stories were countered with clarifications shortly after they were published. Ed Bott has several non-alarmist articles on ZD.
Most shouting gloom and doom make up a minority of the customer base (some don't even use Windows, or at least claim not to do so), shout doom and gloom with each release, then move on to something else after launch. It's a cycle that repeats with every release. This pretty much sums it up:
http://www.istartedsomething.com/20061017/dont-need-windows/