To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
//I mean Novell cannot possibly make use of MS patented intelectual property without committing it upstream as stated under the GPL. //
Novell's SuSe Linux Enterprise 10 (commonly referred to as SLED) already contains some proprietary applications.
This is what Microsoft refer to as "mixed source". Novell are perfectly at liberty to "make use of MS patented intelectual property" within those proprietary parts of SLED.
http://www.novell.com/products/desktop/
The non-proprietary parts of SuSe Linux are distributed as OpenSuSe.
http://en.opensuse.org/Welcome_to_openSUSE.org
This is GPL code. Novell aren't at liberty to include MS patented code in that, because it isn't Novell's code to begin with. This part of SuSe must necessarily remain under the GPL.




Member since:
2005-07-06
What does the GPL mean in the context of the given article?
I mean Novell cannot possibly make use of MS patented intelectual property without committing it upstream as stated under the GPL.
What happens after that 5 years term agreement?
Will MS legally kill everybody who happens to use a tainted source tree?