Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 3rd Nov 2006 16:08 UTC, submitted by twickline
GNU, GPL, Open Source Of course the net is buzzing with reactions to the Novell-Microsoft agreement of yesterday. Bruce Perens is very negative about it all: "What aren't they telling you? First, you can be sure that Microsoft's not out to help a competitor. This announcement paves the way for Microsoft to implement significant control over commercial customer's use of Free Software. And it has significant negative implications for Open Source in general." Eben Moglen of the FSF says about the possible GPL issues: "If you make an agreement which requires you to pay a royalty to anybody for the right to distribute GPL software, you may not distribute it under the GPL."
Thread beginning with comment 178569
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Miguel's take
by miguel on Fri 3rd Nov 2006 21:17 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Miguel's take"
miguel
Member since:
2005-07-27


1) ODF = Encumbered by Sun Patents
2) PDF = Patented by Adobe
3) OpenXML = Encumbered by Microsoft patents

Which of the above is "open" and which one is EVIL?

Any guesses?


Microsoft has actually a covenant for their Office XML specification:

http://www.microsoft.com/office/xml/covenant.mspx

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

v RE[4]: Miguel's take
by NotParker on Sat 4th Nov 2006 00:19 in reply to "RE[3]: Miguel's take"
RE[5]: Miguel's take
by dylansmrjones on Sat 4th Nov 2006 12:13 in reply to "RE[4]: Miguel's take"
dylansmrjones Member since:
2005-10-02

Any evidence for those three claims?

Naah..? Thought so...

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2